<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 595 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379867</link>
    <description>The appellant was found entitled to the value-based exemption under Notification No. 06/05-ST despite paying the service tax before opting for the exemption. Once the appellant opted for the exemption, it could not be withdrawn, allowing them to claim the exemption up to Rs. 8 lakhs. Citing a precedent under a similar issue, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 595 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379867</link>
      <description>The appellant was found entitled to the value-based exemption under Notification No. 06/05-ST despite paying the service tax before opting for the exemption. Once the appellant opted for the exemption, it could not be withdrawn, allowing them to claim the exemption up to Rs. 8 lakhs. Citing a precedent under a similar issue, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the previous order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>