https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379862 The tribunal found that the demand of service tax on repair and maintenance services for computer peripherals during 2003 was not time-barred. The appellant's failure to disclose their belief that the services were not taxable upfront constituted a suppression of facts, justifying the extended period for demand. The tribunal upheld the decision to remand the matter for a fresh decision on merit, dismissing the appeal and affirming the impugned order. The case underscores the significance of transparent communication with tax authorities to ensure compliance with tax obligations. en-us Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2019 06:26:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379862 The tribunal found that the demand of service tax on repair and maintenance services for computer peripherals during 2003 was not time-barred. The appellant's failure to disclose their belief that the services were not taxable upfront constituted a suppression of facts, justifying the extended period for demand. The tribunal upheld the decision to remand the matter for a fresh decision on merit, dismissing the appeal and affirming the impugned order. The case underscores the significance of transparent communication with tax authorities to ensure compliance with tax obligations. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 05 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379862