https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379854 A rectification of mistake application was presented against an earlier CESTAT order, with the applicant asserting that the application was filed in time because the order had not been served and was obtained later from counsel. The Tribunal noted prima facie that the application appeared to have been filed beyond six months from the order date, but directed the registry to report on whether service of the order had been effected on the applicant. The matter was then fixed for further hearing, with advance supply of the registry report to the applicant. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2019 06:26:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379854 A rectification of mistake application was presented against an earlier CESTAT order, with the applicant asserting that the application was filed in time because the order had not been served and was obtained later from counsel. The Tribunal noted prima facie that the application appeared to have been filed beyond six months from the order date, but directed the registry to report on whether service of the order had been effected on the applicant. The matter was then fixed for further hearing, with advance supply of the registry report to the applicant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379854