<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 574 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379846</link>
    <description>Mixed Fuel Oil was considered against classification as motor spirit under heading 2710 19 90. The Tribunal applied the test that, to qualify as motor spirit, the product must be shown by proper evidence to be suitable for use in admixture with something other than mineral oil. As Revenue did not produce the required evidence, the proposed reclassification and duty demand could not be sustained. The view was therefore in favour of the assessee, and the product was not classified as motor spirit on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 06:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 574 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379846</link>
      <description>Mixed Fuel Oil was considered against classification as motor spirit under heading 2710 19 90. The Tribunal applied the test that, to qualify as motor spirit, the product must be shown by proper evidence to be suitable for use in admixture with something other than mineral oil. As Revenue did not produce the required evidence, the proposed reclassification and duty demand could not be sustained. The view was therefore in favour of the assessee, and the product was not classified as motor spirit on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>