https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379844 Exemption for the medicine sold as 'Paraxin' turned on proof that it matched the scheduled product containing Chloramphenicol under the notification dated 31.03.1992. The authorities had rejected the claim because the available material did not establish the product's composition, while the Tribunal had not independently examined the medicine or obtained expert verification. On this record, the factual question could not be conclusively resolved without expert assistance, so the matter required fresh determination. The Tribunal's order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration with appropriate expert examination. en-us Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 May 2019 06:25:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379844 Exemption for the medicine sold as 'Paraxin' turned on proof that it matched the scheduled product containing Chloramphenicol under the notification dated 31.03.1992. The authorities had rejected the claim because the available material did not establish the product's composition, while the Tribunal had not independently examined the medicine or obtained expert verification. On this record, the factual question could not be conclusively resolved without expert assistance, so the matter required fresh determination. The Tribunal's order was set aside and the matter remanded for reconsideration with appropriate expert examination. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379844