<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1884 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280530</link>
    <description>The Company Petition seeking rectification of the Register of Members for 87600 shares under the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed by the Bench. The Petitioner&#039;s request for reinstatement of registered holders and recognition as Constituted Attorney was denied. The Respondents successfully argued against the petition, citing limitations, lack of evidence, and previous legal precedents. The Bench emphasized the delay in filing, absence of proper documentation, and lack of merit in the petition&#039;s prayers. Ultimately, the Company Petition was deemed ineligible and lacking in merit, leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1884 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280530</link>
      <description>The Company Petition seeking rectification of the Register of Members for 87600 shares under the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed by the Bench. The Petitioner&#039;s request for reinstatement of registered holders and recognition as Constituted Attorney was denied. The Respondents successfully argued against the petition, citing limitations, lack of evidence, and previous legal precedents. The Bench emphasized the delay in filing, absence of proper documentation, and lack of merit in the petition&#039;s prayers. Ultimately, the Company Petition was deemed ineligible and lacking in merit, leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>