<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1689 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280529</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act. Relying on various High Court judgments, the Tribunal ruled that no disallowance is warranted if the assessee has not earned any income not forming part of the total income. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 12.12.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 05:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1689 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280529</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act. Relying on various High Court judgments, the Tribunal ruled that no disallowance is warranted if the assessee has not earned any income not forming part of the total income. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 12.12.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>