<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1357 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both grounds. The addition of Rs. 39,21,960 for financial assistance was disallowed due to lack of evidence that the liability arose during the year. Similarly, the addition of Rs. 80,18,000 for service charges on gunny bags was disallowed as it did not meet the requirements under Section 145A and lacked supporting documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 05:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1357 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both grounds. The addition of Rs. 39,21,960 for financial assistance was disallowed due to lack of evidence that the liability arose during the year. Similarly, the addition of Rs. 80,18,000 for service charges on gunny bags was disallowed as it did not meet the requirements under Section 145A and lacked supporting documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>