<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1620 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280537</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty levied under section 234E was deemed invalid and deleted. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer was not authorized to charge fees under section 234E for TDS statements processed before 1st June 2015, as per the amendments to Section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the retrospective application of the amended provisions, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 05:56:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1620 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280537</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty levied under section 234E was deemed invalid and deleted. The Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer was not authorized to charge fees under section 234E for TDS statements processed before 1st June 2015, as per the amendments to Section 200A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision was based on the retrospective application of the amended provisions, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>