https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379840 The Court granted interim relief to the Petitioners in a case challenging the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's order and statutory provisions under the CGST Act. The Petitioners contested allegations of profiteering, arguing against the NAPA's selective pricing analysis. The Court acknowledged the Petitioners' prima facie case, directing them to deposit a specified amount with the Central Consumer Welfare Fund to stay the NAPA's order. The judgment emphasized the importance of due process and legal review in addressing anti-profiteering measures and balancing regulatory compliance with business autonomy. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Dec 2020 22:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379840 The Court granted interim relief to the Petitioners in a case challenging the National Anti-Profiteering Authority's order and statutory provisions under the CGST Act. The Petitioners contested allegations of profiteering, arguing against the NAPA's selective pricing analysis. The Court acknowledged the Petitioners' prima facie case, directing them to deposit a specified amount with the Central Consumer Welfare Fund to stay the NAPA's order. The judgment emphasized the importance of due process and legal review in addressing anti-profiteering measures and balancing regulatory compliance with business autonomy. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379840