https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379840 A writ challenge questioned the anti-profiteering framework under the CGST Act and Rules, including the authority's structure, the methodology for identifying profiteering, and the absence of appellate review. On the material then before the Delhi HC, the court found a prima facie case and the balance of convenience in favour of preserving the status quo, so coercive action was kept in abeyance pending final adjudication. Interim protection was linked to a deposit condition with the Central Consumer Welfare Fund, while the writ petition remained pending for further hearing. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Mar 2025 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379840 A writ challenge questioned the anti-profiteering framework under the CGST Act and Rules, including the authority's structure, the methodology for identifying profiteering, and the absence of appellate review. On the material then before the Delhi HC, the court found a prima facie case and the balance of convenience in favour of preserving the status quo, so coercive action was kept in abeyance pending final adjudication. Interim protection was linked to a deposit condition with the Central Consumer Welfare Fund, while the writ petition remained pending for further hearing. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379840