<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18032</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras determined that the expenditure incurred by the assessee on fees paid to share registrars and solicitors in connection with raising further capital is to be treated as revenue expenditure. The court considered relevant case law and concluded that the expenses were administrative in nature, allowing for deduction as revenue expenditure. The decision favored the assessee, with no costs awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:01:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 45 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18032</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras determined that the expenditure incurred by the assessee on fees paid to share registrars and solicitors in connection with raising further capital is to be treated as revenue expenditure. The court considered relevant case law and concluded that the expenses were administrative in nature, allowing for deduction as revenue expenditure. The decision favored the assessee, with no costs awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>