<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 947 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280520</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in mandating approval for admitting 100 students annually to a Dental College without proper re-evaluation by the Dental Council of India (DCI). Emphasizing minimal judicial interference with expert bodies, the Court directed fresh inspections to verify compliance with educational standards. Specific directions included permitting admission of up to 100 students subject to DCI regulations, with the DCI recommending final approval to the Central Government within three weeks. Eligible students were allowed to resume classes and take examinations as per DCI guidelines, with the order being case-specific and not a precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 17:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 947 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280520</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in mandating approval for admitting 100 students annually to a Dental College without proper re-evaluation by the Dental Council of India (DCI). Emphasizing minimal judicial interference with expert bodies, the Court directed fresh inspections to verify compliance with educational standards. Specific directions included permitting admission of up to 100 students subject to DCI regulations, with the DCI recommending final approval to the Central Government within three weeks. Eligible students were allowed to resume classes and take examinations as per DCI guidelines, with the order being case-specific and not a precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>