<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 564 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280519</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board (CLB) determined that disputes regarding allegations of oppression and mismanagement, brought in a company petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, should be resolved through arbitration based on agreements containing arbitration clauses. The CLB held that the issues, although framed as acts of oppression and mismanagement, were essentially breaches of the agreements and fell within the scope of arbitration. Therefore, the CLB directed the parties to settle the disputes through arbitration in accordance with the agreements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 16:52:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 564 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280519</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board (CLB) determined that disputes regarding allegations of oppression and mismanagement, brought in a company petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, should be resolved through arbitration based on agreements containing arbitration clauses. The CLB held that the issues, although framed as acts of oppression and mismanagement, were essentially breaches of the agreements and fell within the scope of arbitration. Therefore, the CLB directed the parties to settle the disputes through arbitration in accordance with the agreements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>