<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 467 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280515</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court reviewed a case concerning delayed promotion in the Indian Administrative Service, alleging a violation of the fundamental right under Article 16. Despite initial objections on filing delay, the Court examined the appellant&#039;s service records and Selection Committee proceedings. The appellant was not recommended for promotion in various years due to disciplinary issues, work speed concerns, and comparative assessments with juniors. The Court found the decisions justified and upheld the promotion based on the 1981 recommendation, dismissing the appeal and determining no violation of Article 16 occurred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 12:57:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 467 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280515</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court reviewed a case concerning delayed promotion in the Indian Administrative Service, alleging a violation of the fundamental right under Article 16. Despite initial objections on filing delay, the Court examined the appellant&#039;s service records and Selection Committee proceedings. The appellant was not recommended for promotion in various years due to disciplinary issues, work speed concerns, and comparative assessments with juniors. The Court found the decisions justified and upheld the promotion based on the 1981 recommendation, dismissing the appeal and determining no violation of Article 16 occurred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>