<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 979 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280509</link>
    <description>The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the Allahabad HC&#039;s order that dismissed a writ petition concerning seniority fixation without providing reasons. The SC emphasized the necessity of recording reasons in judicial decisions for transparency and adherence to natural justice. It remitted the matter back to the HC for fresh disposal with a reasoned order, clarifying that its decision did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 979 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280509</link>
      <description>The SC allowed the appeal, setting aside the Allahabad HC&#039;s order that dismissed a writ petition concerning seniority fixation without providing reasons. The SC emphasized the necessity of recording reasons in judicial decisions for transparency and adherence to natural justice. It remitted the matter back to the HC for fresh disposal with a reasoned order, clarifying that its decision did not express any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>