https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379825 The Court allowed the review petition challenging errors in the final judgment under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. It found merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the exclusion of comparables for ALP determinations, incorrect categorization of services, treatment of interest on delayed receivables, and disagreement with a previous decision. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing errors on record for a just resolution, leading to the decision to allow the review petition and recall the judgment. en-us Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379825 The Court allowed the review petition challenging errors in the final judgment under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act. It found merit in the appellant's contentions regarding the exclusion of comparables for ALP determinations, incorrect categorization of services, treatment of interest on delayed receivables, and disagreement with a previous decision. The Court emphasized the importance of addressing errors on record for a just resolution, leading to the decision to allow the review petition and recall the judgment. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379825