<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order dropping proceedings under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations was not maintainable under Section 129A of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of provision for the Revenue to appeal in such cases under the Regulations, citing precedents and statutory interpretation. The appeal and Stay Application by the Revenue were dismissed, upholding the respondent&#039;s preliminary objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 00:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 523 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order dropping proceedings under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations was not maintainable under Section 129A of the Customs Act. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of provision for the Revenue to appeal in such cases under the Regulations, citing precedents and statutory interpretation. The appeal and Stay Application by the Revenue were dismissed, upholding the respondent&#039;s preliminary objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>