<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Courts Must Clearly Explain Rejection of Arguments to Uphold Natural Justice in VAT and Sales Tax Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46360</link>
    <description>Principles of natural justice - Whether an argument was rejected validly or otherwise, reasoning of the order alone can show. To evaluate the submissions is obligation of the Court and to know the reasons for rejection of its contention is a legitimate expectation on the part of the litigant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 07:19:58 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 07:19:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Courts Must Clearly Explain Rejection of Arguments to Uphold Natural Justice in VAT and Sales Tax Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46360</link>
      <description>Principles of natural justice - Whether an argument was rejected validly or otherwise, reasoning of the order alone can show. To evaluate the submissions is obligation of the Court and to know the reasons for rejection of its contention is a legitimate expectation on the part of the litigant.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 07:19:58 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>