<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 70 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18013</link>
    <description>A statutory liability for holiday wages and leave with wages under the Bidi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966, was treated as deductible where it had accrued during the relevant accounting year and was properly provided for in mercantile accounts. The dispute turned on accrual, not mere quantification: the liability was not contingent, and actual payment could be deferred without defeating deduction. Applying its earlier decisions, the Madhya Pradesh HC accepted the provision as an ascertained statutory liability and allowed the deduction in computing income, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:14:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 70 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18013</link>
      <description>A statutory liability for holiday wages and leave with wages under the Bidi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966, was treated as deductible where it had accrued during the relevant accounting year and was properly provided for in mercantile accounts. The dispute turned on accrual, not mere quantification: the liability was not contingent, and actual payment could be deferred without defeating deduction. Applying its earlier decisions, the Madhya Pradesh HC accepted the provision as an ascertained statutory liability and allowed the deduction in computing income, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>