<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 78 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18012</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee, directing the assessing authority to verify the actuarial basis of the gratuity provision for Padinjarekara Estates Ltd. The Court upheld the inclusion of estimated coffee pool payments in the deceased&#039;s estate&#039;s principal value, favoring the Revenue. The case was remanded for further verification of the gratuity provision&#039;s actuarial basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 78 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18012</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee, directing the assessing authority to verify the actuarial basis of the gratuity provision for Padinjarekara Estates Ltd. The Court upheld the inclusion of estimated coffee pool payments in the deceased&#039;s estate&#039;s principal value, favoring the Revenue. The case was remanded for further verification of the gratuity provision&#039;s actuarial basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>