<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1089 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280478</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat expenses for acquiring audio rights as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure, following consistent precedent. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the disallowance of a portion of claimed advertisement expenses, in line with previous decisions. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, including the general grounds raised, on 10th November 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 10:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1089 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280478</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to treat expenses for acquiring audio rights as revenue expenditure rather than capital expenditure, following consistent precedent. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the deletion of the disallowance of a portion of claimed advertisement expenses, in line with previous decisions. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, including the general grounds raised, on 10th November 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>