<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 476 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders dated 08.02.2018 and 13.02.2018, as the seizure lapsed after the expiry of the statutory period of ninety days. The seized properties were ordered to be defreezed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 476 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders dated 08.02.2018 and 13.02.2018, as the seizure lapsed after the expiry of the statutory period of ninety days. The seized properties were ordered to be defreezed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>