<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 475 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379747</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order. It ruled that the seizure lapsed upon the expiry of the 90-day period, and no prosecution complaint had been filed. Consequently, the bank accounts were ordered to be defreezed. The tribunal clarified that any pending civil disputes between the parties would be decided independently of this order. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:36:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 475 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379747</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order. It ruled that the seizure lapsed upon the expiry of the 90-day period, and no prosecution complaint had been filed. Consequently, the bank accounts were ordered to be defreezed. The tribunal clarified that any pending civil disputes between the parties would be decided independently of this order. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>