<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 474 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379746</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Provisional Attachment Order and lifted the attachment of the property, ruling in favor of the appellant. The court found that the property was purchased through legitimate means and not with proceeds of crime. The court emphasized the lack of evidence linking the property to alleged embezzled funds and highlighted the absence of any charges or FIR against the appellant. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:35:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 474 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379746</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Provisional Attachment Order and lifted the attachment of the property, ruling in favor of the appellant. The court found that the property was purchased through legitimate means and not with proceeds of crime. The court emphasized the lack of evidence linking the property to alleged embezzled funds and highlighted the absence of any charges or FIR against the appellant. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>