https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379745 The appeal was successful as the court found the provisional attachment order against the appellant's property unsustainable. The appellant proved innocence and lawful acquisition of the property before the alleged offense, with no involvement in the scheduled offense. Procedural lapses, including failure to provide a hearing as required by the law, were noted. Citing legal precedents, the court quashed the attachment order, relieving the property from confiscation. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 08:24:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379745 The appeal was successful as the court found the provisional attachment order against the appellant's property unsustainable. The appellant proved innocence and lawful acquisition of the property before the alleged offense, with no involvement in the scheduled offense. Procedural lapses, including failure to provide a hearing as required by the law, were noted. Citing legal precedents, the court quashed the attachment order, relieving the property from confiscation. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379745