<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 471 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379743</link>
    <description>Where defaulted duty is paid with interest within time and utilisation of Cenvat credit is found not to breach Rule 8(3A), the related duty demand and connected penalty are not sustainable. The note also states that where irregular PLA credit is admitted and the amount is later discharged with interest before notice, penalty may still apply but can be restricted in the facts, with nominal personal penalties on responsible officials remaining justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 471 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379743</link>
      <description>Where defaulted duty is paid with interest within time and utilisation of Cenvat credit is found not to breach Rule 8(3A), the related duty demand and connected penalty are not sustainable. The note also states that where irregular PLA credit is admitted and the amount is later discharged with interest before notice, penalty may still apply but can be restricted in the facts, with nominal personal penalties on responsible officials remaining justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>