<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Service Tax Appeal Denied Over RCM Classification; Payments to Lear Corp. Labeled as Maintenance Charges.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46337</link>
    <description>Classification of services - Reverse charge mechanism (RCM) - there is no evidence in support of the claim of the Appellant that what they were required to pay M/s Lear Corporation, USA was not the maintenance charges for usage of the software but the charges for the software. - Demand confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:18:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Service Tax Appeal Denied Over RCM Classification; Payments to Lear Corp. Labeled as Maintenance Charges.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46337</link>
      <description>Classification of services - Reverse charge mechanism (RCM) - there is no evidence in support of the claim of the Appellant that what they were required to pay M/s Lear Corporation, USA was not the maintenance charges for usage of the software but the charges for the software. - Demand confirmed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 08:18:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>