<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 66 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18005</link>
    <description>The Court held that the transfer of property by the assessee to the partnership firm constituted a transfer for the purpose of capital gains tax. Despite arguments on the nature of partnership transactions, the Court found the tax applicable due to the actual gain in the transaction. The decision favored the Department, concluding that the sale deed constituted a transfer subject to capital gains tax under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:55:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 66 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18005</link>
      <description>The Court held that the transfer of property by the assessee to the partnership firm constituted a transfer for the purpose of capital gains tax. Despite arguments on the nature of partnership transactions, the Court found the tax applicable due to the actual gain in the transaction. The decision favored the Department, concluding that the sale deed constituted a transfer subject to capital gains tax under section 45 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>