<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the appellate authority for reexamination of the eligibility of credit on GTA service after determining the place of removal. The decision emphasized the need for a de novo adjudication, following the same directions as provided in an earlier Final Order regarding similar issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 07:13:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 451 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the appellate authority for reexamination of the eligibility of credit on GTA service after determining the place of removal. The decision emphasized the need for a de novo adjudication, following the same directions as provided in an earlier Final Order regarding similar issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>