<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Concessional Duty Rate Dispute: Are Raw Materials from EOUs or SEZs Considered Imports Under Notification No. 23/2003-CE?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46335</link>
    <description>Concessional rate of duty - benefit of Sr. No.3 to Notification No. 23/2003-CE - denial of benefit on the ground that when raw materials were procured from 100% EOU / SEZ units, the same amounts to “imports” for the purpose of procurement of goods - Contention of the revenue is not acceptable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 07:13:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 07:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Concessional Duty Rate Dispute: Are Raw Materials from EOUs or SEZs Considered Imports Under Notification No. 23/2003-CE?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46335</link>
      <description>Concessional rate of duty - benefit of Sr. No.3 to Notification No. 23/2003-CE - denial of benefit on the ground that when raw materials were procured from 100% EOU / SEZ units, the same amounts to “imports” for the purpose of procurement of goods - Contention of the revenue is not acceptable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 07:13:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>