<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 448 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379720</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but allowed the appellant to discharge 25% of the penalty upon compliance with specified conditions. The appeal was partially allowed in this respect. The Tribunal determined that the assembly of GI pipes into poly houses/green houses at the factory constituted manufacturing, making excise duty applicable for clearances. The appellant&#039;s attempt to split the price to evade duty justified the extended period and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 07:07:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 448 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379720</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but allowed the appellant to discharge 25% of the penalty upon compliance with specified conditions. The appeal was partially allowed in this respect. The Tribunal determined that the assembly of GI pipes into poly houses/green houses at the factory constituted manufacturing, making excise duty applicable for clearances. The appellant&#039;s attempt to split the price to evade duty justified the extended period and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>