<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 441 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379713</link>
    <description>Property used as a commercial or industrial asset, and supported by industrial-use evidence such as a no-objection certificate, industrial electricity billing, and municipal treatment as non-residential, was not treated as urban land for wealth-tax purposes. The later sale of the property with the structure standing on it did not change its character for the relevant assessment years. On that basis, the disputed addition was deleted under the Wealth Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 06:22:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 441 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379713</link>
      <description>Property used as a commercial or industrial asset, and supported by industrial-use evidence such as a no-objection certificate, industrial electricity billing, and municipal treatment as non-residential, was not treated as urban land for wealth-tax purposes. The later sale of the property with the structure standing on it did not change its character for the relevant assessment years. On that basis, the disputed addition was deleted under the Wealth Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>