https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379710 The Supreme Court allowed the Civil Appeal, overturning the decisions of the State and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. The Court criticized the State Commission's unreasoned rejection of the Appellants' Application to file additional documents under Order XLI Rule 27, CPC. It directed the State Commission to admit the documents, emphasizing the importance of due diligence in presenting evidence at the appellate stage. The Court found the documents crucial to the Appellants' case regarding compliance with directives and inability to obtain certificates due to unauthorized structures, prompting a prompt decision on the Appeal due to prolonged pendency since 2013. en-us Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 06:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379710 The Supreme Court allowed the Civil Appeal, overturning the decisions of the State and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions. The Court criticized the State Commission's unreasoned rejection of the Appellants' Application to file additional documents under Order XLI Rule 27, CPC. It directed the State Commission to admit the documents, emphasizing the importance of due diligence in presenting evidence at the appellate stage. The Court found the documents crucial to the Appellants' case regarding compliance with directives and inability to obtain certificates due to unauthorized structures, prompting a prompt decision on the Appeal due to prolonged pendency since 2013. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379710