<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 437 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379709</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Petitioner&#039;s claim for employment under the Sports Quota in the Income Tax Department. It was determined that the selection process adhered to guidelines, and the Petitioner&#039;s contentions of bias and denial of equal protection under the law were not supported. The Petitioner&#039;s challenge was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 437 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379709</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Petitioner&#039;s claim for employment under the Sports Quota in the Income Tax Department. It was determined that the selection process adhered to guidelines, and the Petitioner&#039;s contentions of bias and denial of equal protection under the law were not supported. The Petitioner&#039;s challenge was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s ruling, without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>