https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379709 In sports-quota recruitment, a candidate has no enforceable right to appointment unless the selection process is shown to be arbitrary, illegal or tainted by mala fides. The selection here was carried out through certificate verification, field trials and interview, with marks assigned for sports achievements and performance; the petitioner's score and rank remained below the relevant cut-off. Allegations of bias, nepotism and unequal treatment were unsupported by material showing defect in the shortlisting method, and the direction to disclose the shortlisting criteria was found legally unobjectionable. The writ challenge therefore failed and the selection process was left undisturbed. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 May 2019 09:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379709 In sports-quota recruitment, a candidate has no enforceable right to appointment unless the selection process is shown to be arbitrary, illegal or tainted by mala fides. The selection here was carried out through certificate verification, field trials and interview, with marks assigned for sports achievements and performance; the petitioner's score and rank remained below the relevant cut-off. Allegations of bias, nepotism and unequal treatment were unsupported by material showing defect in the shortlisting method, and the direction to disclose the shortlisting criteria was found legally unobjectionable. The writ challenge therefore failed and the selection process was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379709