<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 428 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379700</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, adjusting estimated commission rates and enhancing allowable expenses. It upheld additions based on corroborative evidence and the statement under section 132(4), granting relief where evidence was lacking. The initiation of proceedings under section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) was upheld, and interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 10:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 428 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379700</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, adjusting estimated commission rates and enhancing allowable expenses. It upheld additions based on corroborative evidence and the statement under section 132(4), granting relief where evidence was lacking. The initiation of proceedings under section 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) was upheld, and interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>