<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Debate on Property Valuation for Tax: Current Date vs. April 1, 1981, u/s 263 Revision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46326</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - cost of acquisition - valuation as on date OR as on 01.04.1981 - The valuer as simply commented upon condition of the property during the course of his verification only - when two views are possible and that has resulted in loss of the revenue it cannot be treated as erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of the revenue unless the view taken by the AO is unsustainable in law</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 06:10:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 06:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Debate on Property Valuation for Tax: Current Date vs. April 1, 1981, u/s 263 Revision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46326</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - cost of acquisition - valuation as on date OR as on 01.04.1981 - The valuer as simply commented upon condition of the property during the course of his verification only - when two views are possible and that has resulted in loss of the revenue it cannot be treated as erroneous order prejudicial to the interest of the revenue unless the view taken by the AO is unsustainable in law</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 06:10:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=46326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>