<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 425 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the Assessing Officer&#039;s original assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the related appeal was dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s order was based on a change of opinion and did not accurately reflect the property&#039;s condition as of 01.04.1981.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=570002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 425 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, ruling that the Assessing Officer&#039;s original assessment was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the related appeal was dismissed as infructuous. The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s order was based on a change of opinion and did not accurately reflect the property&#039;s condition as of 01.04.1981.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>