<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued was defective as it did not specify the nature of the penalty. Relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity of clear charges in penalty notices, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 417 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty notice issued was defective as it did not specify the nature of the penalty. Relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity of clear charges in penalty notices, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) could not be sustained. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and deleted the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>