<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 405 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379677</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the subscription fee received by the assessee was not considered royalty or fees for technical services but rather business income. As there was no Permanent Establishment in India, the income was not taxable in India. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 06:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 405 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379677</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the subscription fee received by the assessee was not considered royalty or fees for technical services but rather business income. As there was no Permanent Establishment in India, the income was not taxable in India. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>