<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the order under Section 144 invalid due to lack of notice and opportunity. Full exemption under Section 54 was granted as the investment was made by the revised return date. Consequently, interest under Section 234B and penalty under Section 271(1)(c) were impacted in favor of the assessee. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the disallowance under Section 54 was vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 403 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the order under Section 144 invalid due to lack of notice and opportunity. Full exemption under Section 54 was granted as the investment was made by the revised return date. Consequently, interest under Section 234B and penalty under Section 271(1)(c) were impacted in favor of the assessee. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the disallowance under Section 54 was vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>