https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280467 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, granting the assessee deductions under Sections 54 and 54F for investing in residential properties, including one outside India, and ruled that indexation for inherited property should start from the year the previous owner held the asset. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessee's entitlement to exemptions and indexation treatment. This judgment was issued on June 27, 2018. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 06:02:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280467 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decisions, granting the assessee deductions under Sections 54 and 54F for investing in residential properties, including one outside India, and ruled that indexation for inherited property should start from the year the previous owner held the asset. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessee's entitlement to exemptions and indexation treatment. This judgment was issued on June 27, 2018. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280467