https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280475 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant repeatedly failed to appear despite notice and did not seek adjournment. The Tribunal noted that no hearing notice had been returned undelivered and that the appellant had also remained absent on earlier dates, indicating no interest in pursuing the matter. The order applied the principle that law assists vigilant litigants, not those who remain inactive, and concluded by rejecting the appeal on that procedural ground. en-us Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 06:02:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280475 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant repeatedly failed to appear despite notice and did not seek adjournment. The Tribunal noted that no hearing notice had been returned undelivered and that the appellant had also remained absent on earlier dates, indicating no interest in pursuing the matter. The order applied the principle that law assists vigilant litigants, not those who remain inactive, and concluded by rejecting the appeal on that procedural ground. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280475