<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 77 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17991</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of expenditure under sections 37(3A) and 37(3B), as well as the allowance of the claim under section 43B. However, on the matter of the Tribunal&#039;s authority to remand for section 215, the court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for further review and a more detailed explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 77 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17991</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of expenditure under sections 37(3A) and 37(3B), as well as the allowance of the claim under section 43B. However, on the matter of the Tribunal&#039;s authority to remand for section 215, the court remanded the case back to the Tribunal for further review and a more detailed explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>