<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 519 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280458</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that select lists expire after one year as per Rule 26 of the Recruitment Rules, contrary to the Allahabad High Court&#039;s interpretation. As the select list had expired, mandamus for recruitment was deemed illegal, and appointments made beyond the one-year period were against Statutory Rules. The Court dismissed the Writ Petitions, emphasizing the importance of legal rights and duties in issuing mandamus. Additionally, the Court condoned delays and invoked jurisdiction under Article 136 to address the case&#039;s merits, despite the availability of an appeal to the Division Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 10:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 519 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280458</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that select lists expire after one year as per Rule 26 of the Recruitment Rules, contrary to the Allahabad High Court&#039;s interpretation. As the select list had expired, mandamus for recruitment was deemed illegal, and appointments made beyond the one-year period were against Statutory Rules. The Court dismissed the Writ Petitions, emphasizing the importance of legal rights and duties in issuing mandamus. Additionally, the Court condoned delays and invoked jurisdiction under Article 136 to address the case&#039;s merits, despite the availability of an appeal to the Division Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>