<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 519 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280458</link>
    <description>A mandamus to appoint candidates from a select list cannot be sustained once the list has expired under the governing recruitment rules, because judicial relief requires a subsisting legal right and a corresponding legal duty. On that basis, the expired select list did not confer any enforceable entitlement to appointment, and alleged illegality in appointments made in other cases could not create a right in favour of the claimants. The text also notes that delay in filing the appeal may be condoned for sufficient cause, and that the availability of an intra-court remedy does not, by itself, bar recourse under Article 136 where circumstances justify its exercise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 10:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 519 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280458</link>
      <description>A mandamus to appoint candidates from a select list cannot be sustained once the list has expired under the governing recruitment rules, because judicial relief requires a subsisting legal right and a corresponding legal duty. On that basis, the expired select list did not confer any enforceable entitlement to appointment, and alleged illegality in appointments made in other cases could not create a right in favour of the claimants. The text also notes that delay in filing the appeal may be condoned for sufficient cause, and that the availability of an intra-court remedy does not, by itself, bar recourse under Article 136 where circumstances justify its exercise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=280458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>