<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 382 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition under Section 7 of the IBC as the Financial Creditor failed to prove the alleged debt and default by the Corporate Debtor. The invocation of pledged shares and ongoing arbitration proceedings were key considerations in the decision. The Tribunal found that the Financial Creditor did not establish the debt and default, especially given the pledged shares and unresolved arbitration matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 08:28:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 382 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the petition under Section 7 of the IBC as the Financial Creditor failed to prove the alleged debt and default by the Corporate Debtor. The invocation of pledged shares and ongoing arbitration proceedings were key considerations in the decision. The Tribunal found that the Financial Creditor did not establish the debt and default, especially given the pledged shares and unresolved arbitration matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>