<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed all 20 appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) on all issues. The Tribunal found that the rebate and refund claims were filed within the limitation period, the respondent was eligible for Cenvat Credit on Real Estate Agent Service and Works Contract Service, and the foreign exchange fluctuations did not affect the rebate claims. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced in the open court on 03/05/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 380 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed all 20 appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) on all issues. The Tribunal found that the rebate and refund claims were filed within the limitation period, the respondent was eligible for Cenvat Credit on Real Estate Agent Service and Works Contract Service, and the foreign exchange fluctuations did not affect the rebate claims. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced in the open court on 03/05/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>