<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 378 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379650</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by a Chartered Accountant firm against an Order-in-Appeal confirming penalties and re-computation of taxable value was dismissed as infructuous by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted the issuance of a Denovo adjudication order by the lower authority post-appeal filing and the appellant&#039;s intention to appeal it. Given the ongoing developments and potential appeal before the first appellate authority, the Tribunal declined to decide on penalties, stating it should be addressed at the first appellate authority level. Therefore, the appeal seeking modification of the impugned order was deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 08:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 378 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379650</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by a Chartered Accountant firm against an Order-in-Appeal confirming penalties and re-computation of taxable value was dismissed as infructuous by the Tribunal. The Tribunal noted the issuance of a Denovo adjudication order by the lower authority post-appeal filing and the appellant&#039;s intention to appeal it. Given the ongoing developments and potential appeal before the first appellate authority, the Tribunal declined to decide on penalties, stating it should be addressed at the first appellate authority level. Therefore, the appeal seeking modification of the impugned order was deemed infructuous and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>