<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 375 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379647</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activities were not classified under &quot;Business Auxiliary Services,&quot; therefore not liable for service tax. The Tribunal allowed the appeals entirely with consequential benefits, including granting the refund claim for service tax paid during a specific period. The Department&#039;s applications for a change of cause title were dismissed. The decision was announced on 29.04.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569864" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 375 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379647</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activities were not classified under &quot;Business Auxiliary Services,&quot; therefore not liable for service tax. The Tribunal allowed the appeals entirely with consequential benefits, including granting the refund claim for service tax paid during a specific period. The Department&#039;s applications for a change of cause title were dismissed. The decision was announced on 29.04.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>