<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 369 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379641</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be established on presumptions, private records or uncorroborated statements; the record must show tangible, independent evidence linking the factory, raw materials, transport, buyers and sale proceeds. A belated stock discrepancy derived from a panchnama and reconciliation chart was treated as unreliable where the unit was under departmental physical supervision and no contemporaneous shortage or excess was verified. Railway receipts, parcel agents&#039; notebooks and third-party statements were also found insufficient without direct linkage to the factory or corroboration such as raw-material consumption, excess electricity or proved buyer evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 07:04:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 369 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379641</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be established on presumptions, private records or uncorroborated statements; the record must show tangible, independent evidence linking the factory, raw materials, transport, buyers and sale proceeds. A belated stock discrepancy derived from a panchnama and reconciliation chart was treated as unreliable where the unit was under departmental physical supervision and no contemporaneous shortage or excess was verified. Railway receipts, parcel agents&#039; notebooks and third-party statements were also found insufficient without direct linkage to the factory or corroboration such as raw-material consumption, excess electricity or proved buyer evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>