<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 368 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original authority. The appellant was deemed entitled to CENVAT Credit based on invoices for Port Services from Visakhapatnam Port Trust, supported by debit notes and a declaration from M/s K R &amp;amp; Sons. The appellant could also claim CENVAT Credit for the remaining disputed invoices upon producing satisfactory invoices to the Asst. Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 07:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=569855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 368 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original authority. The appellant was deemed entitled to CENVAT Credit based on invoices for Port Services from Visakhapatnam Port Trust, supported by debit notes and a declaration from M/s K R &amp;amp; Sons. The appellant could also claim CENVAT Credit for the remaining disputed invoices upon producing satisfactory invoices to the Asst. Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=379640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>